| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Standards-Based Grading Warm Up Discussion

This version was saved 16 years, 8 months ago View current version     Page history
Saved by PBworks
on August 5, 2007 at 1:13:38 am
 

Standards-Based Grading Discussion/Warm UP

Moderator: Repairman

 

 

Working together using this wiki

 

 

Think of this wiki as a shared online whiteboard. We can pool information using this wiki, making our learning and research accessible to everyone. Play around with this wiki: Notice how you can add comments to a page, see what people have changed, and edit all the text.

 

The above paragraph is pro forma reassurance from PBWiki, folks. Now we're jumping into the pool.

 

Standards-Based Grading, or SBG from here on, is also known as "grading linked to standards," and "grading for learning." (Thanks to EI for the new term and three-letter acronym!)

 

What I have in mind is to kick off our examination of standards-based grading with a warm up discussion wherein we analyze a couple of grading situations that made the papers. In SBG Warm Up Draft 1, let's look at the articles separately, comment on them, then compare the situations and draw some conclusions about what's being described in the articles.

 

In SBG Discussion 1, after the Warm Up, we'll talk about what grades are for, who needs to know what grades tell about a student, and what grades should and should not describe. In SBG Discussion 2 and subsequent discussions, we'll continue with our examination of SBG and apply what we've learned from wiki participation.

 

If it will suit the participants, I'll ask questions here and there to bring out additional information and insight. If you promise to go easy, I may even play Devil's Advocate.

 

For our comments, let's use "normal" format, "Verdana" for the font, and "small" for size.

 

BTW, the NYT URL in the source table didn't want to light up, so copy and paste it into your browser, or click on the cited version above the table.

 

Got your life jackets on? Let's go to SBG Warm Up: Draft 1 (below) for further instructions, then bounce back here to read the articles and make notes for the observations you will write in SBG Warm Up: Draft 1.

 

 

 Group Members

 

  • The Science Goddess (SG)
  • MissProfe (MP)
  • Exhausted Intern (EI)
  • Joel (Joel)
  • Eric (Eric)
  • Repairman (RM)

 

 

Sources

 

  1. Clevenger, A. (2007, May, 9). Judge tosses lawsuit over grade. Saturday Gazette-Mail, Retrieved August 4, 2007, from http://www.wvgazette.com/section/News/2007050824?pt=0
  2. Freedman, S. (2007, Aug, 1). A Teacher Grows Disillusioned After a 'Fail' Becomes a 'Pass'. The New York Times, Retrieved August 4, 2007, from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/01/education/01education.html?_r=2&ref=education&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

 

 

 

Meetings

 

Let's continue this discussion in the same way we participated in Eric's Home Page discussion. Drop in, contribute, come back, edit and contribute, and so on until we reach a conclusion. We'll apply what we learn about wiki participation as we go.

 

 

Drafts

 

We'll keep our drafts here so we can refer to earlier versions.

 

SBG Warm Up: Draft 1

 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.